An employee who quit his job was not entitled to a bonus payout, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled, finding that the language of the bonus plan requiring “active employment” as a condition to receive a payout did not violate Ontario’s Employment Standards Act.
Related Articles
-
Coworker’s happy-hour conduct supports hostile work environment claim
By Kathleen Kapusta, J.D. A coworker’s alleged harassment of an employee, including running his fingers down her back, grabbing...
-
Are Employers Required to Give Workers Meal and Rest Breaks?
Employers may have a difficult time figuring out which employees are entitled to take meal and rest breaks and...
-
Weekly Tip-Pooling Policy Doesn’t Violate California Labor Code
A coffee shop’s policy of pooling tips on a weekly basis and distributing them to service employees based on...
-
Could Swiss-Style Apprenticeships Fill in the U.S. Skills Gap?
As U.S. employers create more jobs with in-demand skills, businesses, workforce development advocates, educational institutions and the government are...
-
As Daylight Saving Time Ends, Wage & Hour Problems Begin
As daylight saving time ends and in most states clocks are set back one hour, the time change presents...
-
Employers Use Technology and Outsourcing to Ease Leave Management
While the legal requirements to provide paid or unpaid leave become more complex, leave-management tools and services continue to...
-
Overtime for Former Employee Was Paid at Correct Rate
A former city employee in Alabama failed to support his claims that his employer paid his overtime wages at...
-
How to Design a 21st Century Time Off Program
Today’s time off policies are a far cry from the days when two weeks’ vacation and eight fixed holidays...
0 Comments